PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

 

e-ISSN 2231-8534
ISSN 0128-7702

Home / Regular Issue / JSSH Vol. 29 (4) Dec. 2021 / JSSH-8314-2021

 

University Students’ Perceptions of Motivation, Attitude, and Self-Efficacy in Online English Language Learning

Shaidatul Akma Adi Kasuma, Ayuni Akhiar, Haeza Haron, Sharifah Nur Hamizah Syed Fesal, and Nor Fazliyaton Abdul Kadir

Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Volume 29, Issue 4, December 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.36

Keywords: Attitude, motivation, online learning, self-efficacy, university students

Published on: 13 December 2021

The study examines university students’ perceptions of their motivation, attitude, and self-efficacy in online English proficiency classes. Existing research indicate that these individual differences directly affect learning especially during the period of online instructions; as students may suffer from the feeling of isolation and loneliness, being far away from an immediate learning community. A set of questionnaire score was created from the adaptation of five existing surveys to measure the individual differences. It was distributed to 270 participants via convenient sampling at a university in Malaysia. The results of this study demonstrate the students’ perception of a strong self-efficacy of their digital and technical ability in managing, completing, and submitting English language tasks via online medium. Relatedly, students perceive a high positive attitude and decent motivation for online English learning. Furthermore, the students demonstrate a preference for a synchronous session, which is linked to forming a community of learners as an academic support system. The findings are discussed in relation to human factors and pedagogy. It considers students’ needs for engaging sessions, and teachers’ limitations in creating content while emphasising creative and fun language activities.

  • Alberth. (2019). Use of Facebook, students’ intrinsic motivation to study writing, writing self-efficacy and writing performance. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1552892

  • Ali, J. K. M., & Bin-Hady, W. R. A. (2019). A study of EFL students’ attitudes, motivation and anxiety towards WhatsApp as a language learning tool. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on CALL (5). 289-298. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.19

  • Alizadeh, M. (2016). The impact of motivation on english language learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p123

  • Altunkaya, H., & Topuzkanamış, E. (2018). The effect of using Facebook in writing education on writing achievement, attitude, anxiety and self-efficacy perception. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2133-2142. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061010

  • Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C., & Boehm, L. (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020203

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

  • Bandura, A. (1997). The exercise of control. Freeman.

  • Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 139-153.

  • Brown, E. A., Thomas, N. J., & Thomas, L.Y. (2014). Students׳ willingness to use response and engagement technology in the classroom. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 15, 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.06.002.

  • Choy, S. C., & Troudi, S. (2006). An investigation into the changes in perceptions of and attitudes towards learning English in a Malaysian college. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 120-130.

  • Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Dass, L. C. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 46-58.

  • Cocca, M., & Cocca, A. (2019). Affective variables and motivation as predictors of proficiency in English as a foreign language. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 12(3), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2019.120302

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343

  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.

  • Henaku, E. A. (2020). Covid-19: Online learning experience of college students: The case of Ghana. International Journal of Multipdisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, 1(2), 54-62.

  • Hosseini, S., & Pourmandnia, D. (2013). Language learners’attitudes and beliefs: Brief review of the related literature and frameworks. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(4), 63-74.

  • Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computer Education, 55(3), 1080-1090.

  • Hussein, E., Daoud, S., Alrabaiah, H., & Badawi, R. (2020). Exploring undergraduate students’ attitudes towards emergency online learning during COVID-19: A case from the UAE. Children and Youth Services Review, 119(November), 105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105699

  • Jalleh, C. M., Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2021). Oral communication apprehension among Japanese EFL international students in a language immersion program in Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14210a

  • Kassem, H. M. (2018). The impact of student-centered instruction on EFL learners’ affect and achievement. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p134

  • Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670

  • Kellerman, D. (2021). Academics aren’t content creators, and it’s regressive to make them so. The World University Ranking. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/academics-arent-content-creators-and-its-regressive-make-them-so

  • Kruk, M. (2019). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in Second Life: the case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1677722

  • Kundu, A. (2020). Toward a framework for strengthening participants’ self-efficacy in online education. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2020-0039

  • Lasekan, O. (2019). The role of individual difference factors among early, middle and late immersion undergraduate ESL learners. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(10), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.18.10.11

  • Lee, A. (2021). Breaking through digital barriers: Exploring EFL students’ views of Zoom breakout room experiences. English Studies, 21, 510-524.

  • Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1).

  • Martin, S., & Alvarez Valdivia, I. M. (2017). Students’ feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral tasks. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0056-z

  • Martín-Rodríguez, Ó., Fernández-Molina, J. C., Montero-Alonso, M. Á., & González-Gómez, F. (2015). The main components of satisfaction with e-learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(2), 267-277.

  • Mohd Yasin, N. M., Ong, M. H. A., & Aziz, N. N. A. (2020). Attitude as mediator of technical usage self-efficacy, online communication self-efficacy, technology access and online media on the blended learning readiness. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6 Special Issue), 713-724.

  • Octaberlina, L. R., & Muslimin, A. I. (2020). EFL students perspective towards online learning barriers and alternatives using moodle/google classroom during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p1

  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), New Frontiers for Self-Research (Vol. 2, pp. 95-122). IAP.

  • Petchinalert, S., & Aksornjarung, P. (2016). Reading strategy use and its relation to EFL teachers’ reading self-efficacy. International (Humanities, Social Sciences and Arts), 9(4), 168-183.

  • Radia, B. (2019). Approaching a reading course via moodle-based blended learning: EFL learners’ insights. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Method, 9(11), 1-12.

  • Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2019). E-learning: Development of a model to assess the acceptance and readiness of technology among language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5-6), 730-750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640255

  • Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p60

  • Reeve, J. (2009). Understanding motivation and emotion (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Reuters. (2021). Covid-19 Tracker. Malaysia. (2021, August 18). https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/countries-and-territories/malaysia/

  • Salikin, H., & Tahir, S. B. (2017). The social media-based approach in teaching writing at Jember University, Indonesia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 46.

  • Selvanathan, M., Hussin, N. A. M., & Azazi, N. A. N. (2020). Students learning experiences during COVID-19: Work from home period in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. Teaching Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420977900

  • Selvaratnam, V. (2019). Malaysia’s national language policy and graduate employability. International Higher Education, 96(28), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2019.96.10776

  • Sharma, V. (2019). Saudi students’ perspective on social media usage to promote EFL Learning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 2(1), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2019.2.1.17

  • Sobaih, A. E. E., Hasanein, A. M., & Elnasr, A. E. A. (2020). Responses to COVID-19 in higher education: Social media usage for sustaining formal academic communication in developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166520

  • Stern, D. M., & Willits, M. D. D. (2011). Social media killed the lms: Re-imagining the traditional learning management system in the age of blogs and online social networks. Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education (Vol. 1). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000001020

  • Suryaman, M., Cahyono, Y., Muliansyah, D., Bustani, O., Suryani, P., Fahlevi, M. & Munthe, A. P. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and home online learning system: Does it affect the quality of pharmacy school learning? Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(8), 524-530. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.8.74

  • Taipjutorus, W., Hansen, S., & Brown, M. (2012). Improving learners’ self-efficacy in a learner-controlled online learning environment: A correlational study. In M. Brown, M. Harnett, & T. Stewart (Eds.), Future challenge, sustainable futures. Proceeding Ascilite Wellington 2012 (pp. 907-911). https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/Wellington12/2012/images/custom/taipjutorus%2C_widchaporn_-_improving.pdf

  • Ullah, O., Khan, W., & Khan, A. (2017). Students’ attitude towards online learning at tertiary level. PUTAJ-Humanities and Social Sciences, 25, 63-82.

  • Vandeyar, T. (2020). The academic turn: Social media in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5617-5635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10240-1

  • Wai Yee, S. L., & Cheng Ean, C. L. (2020). Malaysian private university students’ perception of online discussion forums: A qualitative enquiry. Sains Humanika, 12(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v12n2.1610

  • Welser, H. T., Khan, M. L., & Dickard, M. (2019). Digital remediation: Social support and online learning communities can help offset rural digital inequality. Information Communication and Society, 22(5), 717-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566485

  • Williams, V. (2021). Online readiness assessment. Penn State. https://www.scribbr.com/apa-examples/website/

  • Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084

  • Wong, M. S. L. (2005). Language learning strategies and language self-efficacy: Investigating the relationship in Malaysia. RELC Journal, 36(3), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205060050

  • Wu, J. Y., & Nian, M. W. (2021). The dynamics of an online learning community in a hybrid statistics classroom over time: Implications for the question-oriented problem-solving course design with the social network analysis approach. Computers and Education, 166(January), Article 104120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104120

  • Yavuzalp, N., & Bahcivan, E. (2020). The online learning self-efficacy scale: Its adaptation into Turkish and interpretation according to various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 31-44.

  • Zamir, S., & Thomas, M. (2019). The effects of university teachers’ perception, attitude and motivation on their readiness for the integration of ICT in classroom teaching. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(2), 308-326. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v6i2.2712