e-ISSN 2231-8526
ISSN 0128-7680
Mohd Nazri Abdul Rahman, Amin Ismail, Azrina Azlan, Ahmad Fazli Abdul Aziz, Mohd Desa Hassim and Nor Hayati Muhammad
Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, Volume 47, Issue 2, May 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.47.2.09
Keywords: Carotenoids, minerals, Momordica cochinchinensis L. Spreng, physicochemical, proximate, sugar profiles
Published on: 30 May 2024
The study aims to determine the physical and chemical properties of Momordica cochinchinensis L. Spreng (gac) fruits. Fruit size varied, weighing 359.17 to 588.33g, with lengths of 11.10 to 13.92 cm and circumferences of 27.43 to 30.67 cm. Components included pulp (34.06 to 41.58%), seeds (23.11 to 29.70%), peel (16.65 to 20.60%), and aril (15.64 to 18.64%). Skin and aril colour parameters (L*, a*, b*) indicated maturity and carotenoid content. Aril had higher acidity (pH 5.54±0.02, titratable acidity [TA] 0.03 to 0.05g/L), total soluble solids (TSS, 11.57%±0.52 °Brix), and carbohydrates (55.6 g/100 g) than pulp (pH 5.65±0.02, TA 0.01 to 0.02g/L, TSS 4.90%±0.33 °Brix, carbohydrates 30.9 g/100 g). Peel contained most protein (6.2 g/100 g) and dietary fibre (56.9 to 58.1 g/100 g). Glucose and fructose were found in both pulp and aril. Potassium levels were highest in peel (817.59 mg/100 g), followed by pulp (658.20 mg/100 g) and aril (228.79 mg/100 g). Lycopene dominated carotenoids, especially in aril (31.7 to 103.7 mg/g). β-carotene, lutein, astaxanthin, and zeaxanthin were also present. β-carotene (2.9 to 9.6 mg/g) was second to lycopene, followed by astaxanthin (1.54 to 4.91 mg/g), lutein (0.16 to 1.35 mg/g), and zeaxanthin (0.35 to 1.49 mg/g), absent in pulp. These findings have implications for the food industry, offering insights into gac fruit’s nutritional potential. Malaysian gac exhibited superior nutritional content, with pulp and aril as notable sources of carbohydrates and minerals for consumption and aril as a promising source of healthy oils.
Angkananon, W., & Anantawat, V. (2015). Effects of spray drying conditions on characteristics, nutritional value and antioxidant activity of gac fruit aril powder. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 4(NRRU), 1-11.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (2000). Official methods of analysis (17th ed.). AOAC.
Auisakchaiyoung, T., & Rojanakorn, T. (2015). Effect of foam-mat drying conditions on quality of dried gac fruit (Momordica cochinchinensis) aril. International Food Research Journal, 22(5), 2025-2031.
Bhumsaidon, A., & Chamchong, M. (2016). Variation of lycopene and beta-carotene contents after harvesting of gac fruit and its prediction. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 50(4), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2016.04.003
Chin, Y. Y., Chang, K. A., Ng, W. M., Eng, Z. P., Chew, L. Y., Neo, Y. P., Yan, S. W., Wong, C. L., Kong, K. W., & Ismail, A. (2023). A comparative evaluation of nutritional composition and antioxidant properties of six Malaysian edible seaweeds. Food Chemistry Advances, 3, 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2023.100426
Chintan, K. N., & Vijayakumar, R. (2020). Gac fruit – A tropical bioresource with power packed treasure of antioxidants. Agriculture and Food, 2(5), 104-107.
Chomicki, G., Schaefer, H., & Renner, S. S. (2020). Origin and domestication of Cucurbitaceae crops: Insights from phylogenies, genomics, and archaeology. New Phytologist, 226(5), 1240-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16015
Dujardin, J.-P., & Kitthawee, S. (2013). Phenetic structure of two Bactrocera tau cryptic species (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting Momordica cochinchinensis (Cucurbitaceae) in Thailand and Laos. Zoology, 116(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2012.07.004
Gunasekaran, N., Arumugam, A., & Perumal, S. (2014). Food prospects and nutraceutical attributes of Momordica species: A potential tropical bioresources – A review. Food Science and Human Wellness, 3(3-4), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2014.07.001
Hamidon, A., Shah, R. M., Razali, R. M., & Lob, S. (2020). Effect of different types and concentration of rooting hormones on Momordica cochinensis (gac fruit) root vine cuttings. Malaysian Applied Biology, 49(4), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.55230/mabjournal.v49i4.1602
Huynh, T., & Nguyen, M. H. (2020). Bioactive compounds from gac (Momordica cochinchinensis Lour. Spreng). In H. N. Murthy & V. A. Bapat (Eds.), Bioactive compounds in underutilized fruits and nuts (pp. 591-604). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30182-8_40
Kha, T. C., Nguyen, M. H., Roach, P. D. Parks, S. E., & Stathopoulos, C. (2013). The underutilized gac fruit: Nutrient, composition, health benefits and options for processing. Food Reviews International, 29(1), 92-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2012.692141
Kubola, J., & Siriamornpun, S. (2011). Phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of different fruit fractions (peel, pulp, aril, and seed) of Thai gac (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng). Food Chemistry, 127(3), 1138-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.115
Kubola, J., Meeso, N., & Siriamornpun, S. (2013). Lycopene and beta carotene concentration in aril oil of gac (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng) as influenced by aril-drying process and solvents extraction. FRIN, 50(2), 664–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.004
Le, Q.-U., Lay, H.-L., Wu, M.-C., & Nguyen, T. H.-H. (2018). Natural plant colorants widely used in Vietnam traditional food culture. Journal of Food, Nutrition and Agriculture, 1(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.21839/jfna.2018.v1i1.220
Mai, H. C., Truong, V., Haut, B., & Debaste, F. (2013). Impact of limited drying on Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng. aril carotenoids content and antioxidant activity. Journal of Food Engineering, 118(4), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.04.004
Mukherjee, P. K., Singha, S., Kar, A., Chanda, J., Banerjee, S., Dasgupta, B., Haldar, P. K., & Sharma, N. (2022). Therapeutic importance of Cucurbitaceae: A medicinally important family. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 282, 114599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.114599
Müller-Maatsch, J., Sprenger, J., Hempel, J., Kreiser, F., Carle, R., & Schweiggert, R. M. (2017). Carotenoids from gac fruit aril (Momordica cochinchinensis [Lour.] Spreng.) are more bioaccessible than those from carrot root and tomato fruit. Food Research International, 99(Part 2), 928-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.053
Niyi, O. H., Jonathan, A. A., & Ibukun, A. O. (2019). Comparative assessment of the proximate, mineral composition and mineral safety index of peel, pulp, and seeds of cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 9, 691-701. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2019.99056
Parks, S. E., Nguyen, M. H., Gale, D., & Murray, C. (2013). Assessing the potential for a gac (Cochinchin gourd) industry in Australia. https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:18655
Phan-Thi, H., & Waché, Y. (2014). Isomerization and increase in the antioxidant properties of lycopene from Momordica cochinchinensis (gac) by moderate heat treatment with UV-Vis spectra as a marker. Food Chemistry, 156, 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.040
Ram, B. M. V. S., & Shankar, V. S. (2023). Investigate the tray dried method to analyse the carbohydrate content in pumpkin (Cucurbita) and compare with oven dry method. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 10(1S), 2356-2369. https://doi.org/10.17762/sfs.v10i1S.468
Tran, X. T., & Parks, S. E. (2022). Improving cultivation of gac fruit. In M. Nguyen & T. C. Kha (Eds.), Gac fruit: Advances in cultivation, utilization, health benefits and processing technologies (pp. 1-14). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789247329.0001
Tran, X. T., Parks, S. E., Roach, P. D., Golding, J. B., & Nguyen, M. H. (2016). Effects of maturity on physicochemical properties of gac fruit (Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng.). Food Science and Nutrition, 4(2), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.291
Zheng, H., Zhang, Q., Quan, J., Zheng, Q., & Xi, W. (2016). Determination of sugars, organic acids, aroma components, and carotenoids in grapefruit pulps. Food Chemistry, 205, 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.007
ISSN 0128-7680
e-ISSN 2231-8526