PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

 

e-ISSN 2231-8526
ISSN 0128-7680

Home / Regular Issue / / J

 

J

J

Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, Volume J, Issue J, January J

Keywords: J

Published on: J

J

  • Act on Judicial Administration of the Courts of Justice B.E. 2543 (A.D. 2000) Section 26-28. http://web.krisdika.go.th/lawHeadContent.jsp?fromPage=lawHeadContent&formatFile=htm&hID=0

  • Act on Public Prosecution Administration of the Public Prosecution B.E. 2553 (A.D. 2010) Section 49-52. http://www.ago.go.th/new_law/doc_ago3.pdf

  • American-Bar-Association. (1992). Report of the task force on law schools and the profession: Narrowing the gap. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/28961.pdf

  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

  • Andolšek, D. M., & Andolšek, S. (2015). Knowledge sharing in an organization from the perspective of the individual. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 3(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2015-3-2-65-76

  • Andrews, D., & Baber, C. (2009). The use of narrative in the design of serious games for criminal investigation and community policing. In Q. Mehdi, A. Elmaghraby, D. Anderson & E. Ch’ng (Eds.), Proceedings of CGAMES’2009 USA (pp. 63-67). The University of Wolverhampton.

  • Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3) 363-375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391848

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Lee, R. T. (1990). Defensive behavior in organizations: A preliminary model. Human Relations, 43(7), 621-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679004300702

  • Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1-4.

  • Becker, D. M. (2001). Some concerns about the future of legal education. Journal of Legal Education, 51, 469-486.

  • Biljana, N.-C., & Dragana, S. (2017). Educational needs of teacher for introduction and application of innovative models in educational work to improve teaching International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1701049N

  • Binder, D. A., & Bergman, P. B. (2003). Taking lawyering skills training seriously. Clinical Law Review, 10(19), 191-220.

  • Binder, D. A., Moore, A. J., & Bergman, P. (2007). A depositions course: Tackling the challenge of teaching for professional skills transfer. Clinical Law Review, 13, 871-898.

  • Birzer, M. L. (2003). The theory of andragogy applied to police training. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510310460288

  • Bock, H., Boyd, C., Gibson, S., Lyons, P., Mottershead, T., Rose, L. M., Rushton, T., Stacy, C. U., Vaaler, B., & Westfahl, S. (2009). The future of legal education: A skills continuum. https://clp.usc.edu/assets/docs/contribute/NITAFuture_of_Legal_Education.pdf

  • Boon, A., & Webb, J. (2008). Legal education and training in England and Wales: Back to the future? Journal of Legal Education, 58(1), 79-121.

  • Brest, P. (1995). The responsibility of law schools: Educating lawyers as counselors and problem solvers. Law and Contemporary Problems, 58, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1192017

  • Breuer, J. S., & Bente, G. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1), 8, 10-11.

  • Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663

  • Cannon, H. M., & Feinstein, A. H. (2014). Bloom beyond bloom: Using the revised taxonomy to develop experiential learning strategies. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 32, 349-355.

  • Cantroll, A. M. (1952). Law school and the layman: Is legal education doing its job. American Bar Association Journal, 38, 907.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.

  • Day, J. A., Foley, J. D., Groeneweg, R., & Van der Mast, C. A. (2004). Enhancing the classroom learning experience with Web lectures. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/65

  • Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology (pp. 41-47). Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

  • Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. Little, Brown and Company.

  • Halawi, L. A., McCarthy, R. V., & Pires, S. (2009). An evaluation of e-learning on the basis of Bloom’s taxonomy: An exploratory study. Journal of Education for Business, 84(6), 374-380.

  • Halm, D. S. (2015). The impact of engagement on student learning. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 2(2), 22-33.

  • Irish, C. R. (2006). Reflections of an observer: The international conference on legal education reform. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 24(1), 5-22.

  • Kastberg, S. (2003). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy as a framework for classroom assessment. Mathematics Teacher, 96(6), 402-405. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.96.6.0402

  • Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.004

  • Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education (Vol. 41). Association Press New York.

  • Knowles, M. S. (1978). Andragogy: Adult learning theory in perspective. Community College Review, 5(3), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155217800500302

  • Luengvilai, C., & Yodmongkol, P. (2011, November). What fundamental lawyering skills do law students of Chiang Mai University need to improve their legal practice ability? Paper presented at The 11th Annual SEAAIR Conference: University Social Responsibility: Pathways to Excellence, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

  • Luengvilai, C., & Yodmongkol, P. (2012, September). Interviewing questions design for knowledge capture: Lawyer’s factual investigation skill. Paper presented at The 6th International Conference on Software, Knowledge. Information Management and Application (SKIMA), Chengdu, China.

  • Luengvilai, C., & Yodmongkol, P. (2016). Mediation game when the conflict can be fun to learn—A legal skill learning tool: The integration of knowledge management, learning theory and serious game concept. International Education Studies, 9(5), 219. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p219

  • Maxeiner, J. R., & Yamanaka, K. (2004). The new Japanese law schools: Putting the professional into legal education. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association, 13, 303.

  • McClain, Jr. J. A. (1953). Is legal education do its job? A reply. American Bar Association Journal, 39(2), 120-175.

  • Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3

  • Michael, D. R., & Chen, S. L. (2005). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Thomson Course Technology PTR.

  • Office of the Attorney General of Thailand. (1996). คดีเชอรี่แอน - กระบวนการยุติธรรมจะคุ้มครองสิทธิเสรีภาพของ ผู้บริสุทธิ์ได้อย่างไร? : รายงานการเสวนาทางวิชาการ [Report of the seminar on The Sherry Ann Duncan Case: How to the criminal justice could protect the rights and freedom of the Innocent?]. Office of the Attorney General of Thailand.

  • Park, C. (2003). Engaging students in the learning process: The learning journal. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260305675

  • Pohjonen, S., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2002). Challenges for teaching interaction skills for law students. The Law Teacher, 36(3), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2002.9993110

  • Post, D. (2009, October 31). Cracks appearing in law firms associate model. The Volokh Conspiracy. http://www.volokh.com/2009/10/31/cracks-appearing-in-law-firm-associate-model/

  • Public Law Net. (2017). การปฏิรูปด้านการเรียนการสอนและการศึกษากฎหมาย ตอนที่ 1 และ 2 [Legal studying-teaching and education reform Part 1 and 2]. http://public-law.net/publaw/view.aspx?id=1980

  • Sadler, G. R., Lee, H.-C., Lim, R. S.-H., & Fullerton, J. (2010). Recruiting hard-to-reach United States population sub-groups via adaptations of snowball sampling strategy. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(3), 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x

  • Sathitsuksomboon, C. (2015, March 3). Thailand’s legal system: Requirements, practice, and ethical conduct. Thailand Law Forum: Law analysis and features on Southeast Asia. http://www.thailawforum.com/articles/charununlegal2.html

  • Sattayutchamnan. (2019). วิชาข้อเท็จจริง [Factual theory] (4th ed.). Prayoonwong. (Original work published 1939).

  • Sherry Ann Duncan 1999 No. 2071/2542.

  • Susi, T., Johannesson, M., & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious games: An overview (Technical Report HS-IKI-TR-07-001). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220017759_Serious_Games_-_An_Overview

  • Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Classic work: Theory of organizational knowledge creation. In D. Morey, M. T. Maybury, B.Thuraisingham (Eds.), Knowledge management: Classic and contemporary works. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4075.001.0001

  • Thai Bar Under The Royal Patronage. (1964). Regulation of Thai bar students, studying, and discipline of 1964. http://www.thethaibar.or.th/thaibarweb/files/Data_web/3_%20Kong_Borikan/thabian_naksueksa/Rb_Ed2507.pdf

  • ศาลสั่งจ่าย 26 ล.แพะเชอรี่แอน [Thai Supreme Court ordered a compensation to Sherry Ann Duncan case for 26 million Thai Bath] (2003). Mathichon Weekly. pp. 1-12. https://www.matichonweekly.com/scoop/article_20990

  • Thailand Development Research Institute. (2015), ปฏิรูป (หลักสูตร) นักกฎหมายไทยรับความท้าทายอนาคต [Law curriculum reform to prepare the future challenging]. https://tdri.or.th/2015/10/legal-education-reform/

  • Thailand Lawyers Act B.E. 2528 (A.D. 1985) s. 35. http://web.krisdika.go.th/data/law/law2/%b701/%b701-20-2528-001.pdf

  • Thailand Ministry of Justice. (2015). Rights and liberties protection monthly report. http://www.rlpd.go.th/rlpdnew/index.php/2013-05-30-08-10-17

  • Tipmanee, P. (2011). Analysis and evaluation of the undergraduate programs at Pridi Banomyong Faculty of Law, Dhurakij Pundit University. Dhurakij Pundit University. https://www.dpu.ac.th/dpurdi/research/347

  • Trowler, P., & Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/61680/1/Deliverable_2._Evidence_Summary._Nov_2010.pdf

  • Waincymer, J. (2010). Internationalization of legal education; putting the ‘why’ before the ‘how’. In S. Steele & K.Taylor (Eds.), Legal Education in Asia: Globalization, change and contexts (pp. 68-88). Routledge.

  • Wang, T.-S. (2009). The development of legal education in Taiwan: An analysis of the history of law and society. In S. Steele & K. Taylor (Eds.), Legal Education in Asia: globalization, change and contexts (pp. 136-155). Routledge Law in Asia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203862254

  • Wilson, M. J. (2010). US legal education methods and ideals: Application to the Japanese and Korean systems. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 18, 295-335.

  • Yusoff, A., Crowder, R., Gilbert, L., & Wills, G. (2009, July). A conceptual framework for serious games. In ICALT ‘09: Proceedings of the 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 21-23). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2009.19

ISSN 0128-7680

e-ISSN 2231-8526

Article ID

J

Download Full Article PDF

Share this article

Recent Articles