PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

Student engagement with supervisory feedback plays a crucial role in higher education, but the process often presents complexities that are not fully understood. Despite the importance and inherent challenges, student engagement remains underexplored and lacks research at the undergraduate level. Therefore, this research aimed to thoroughly examine how undergraduate students engaged with supervisory feedback during the thesis writing process. It included five students who had completed their undergraduate thesis in the English Education Department at an Indonesian college. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, think-aloud protocols, and text analysis. The results showed that all students exhibited high affective, cognitive, and behavioral engagement levels with many positive emotions, such as satisfaction and motivation. Furthermore, this research contributed to the existing body of knowledge by underscoring the critical role of affective engagement in fostering cognitive and behavioral outcomes. It also outlined the need for adaptive supervisory models, emotional intelligence training, and the creation of supportive environments. These insights held relevance for academics, university faculty, educational administrators, and students included in the thesis supervision process. Due to the limited number of participants, the research required cautious interpretation, and generalizations should be carefully asserted. Consequently, the analysis suggested the adoption of adaptive supervisory models, the incorporation of emotional intelligence training, and the establishment of supportive environments. Further research with a larger sample size and broader scope was also suggested to validate and expand the results.

• Ali, N., Rose, S., & Ahmed, L. (2015). Psychology students’ perception of and engagement with feedback as a function of year of study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 574-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.936355
  
  Bastola, M. N. (2022). Engagement and challenges in supervisory feedback: Supervisors’ and students’ perceptions. RELC Journal, 53(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220912547
  
  Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2023). From the other side of the desk: Supervisors’ perceptions of supervisory feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, Article 100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100965
  
  Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
  
  Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201
  
  Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Qualitative research in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  
  Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
  
  Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘ Ignoring me is part of learning ’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104
  
  Dang, T. T. D., Scull, J., & Chowdhury, R. (2022). Engagement with a sequence of feedback-correction: A case study of secondary school students in Vietnam. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 1025-1044. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15158a
  
  de Kleijn, R. A. M., Mainhard, M. T., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2013). Master’s thesis projects: Student perceptions of supervisor feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 1012-1026. https://doi.org/1.1080/02602938.2013.777690
  
  de Kleijn, R. A. M., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2015). Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors’ practical knowledge. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934331
  
  de Kleijn, R. A. M., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). The relation between feedback perceptions and the supervisor-student relationship in master’s thesis projects. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860109
  
  Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544
  
  Fernández-Michels, P., & Fornons, L. C. (2021). Learner engagement with corrective feedback using think-aloud protocols. JALT CALL Journal, 17(3), 203-232. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n3.461
  
  Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587804
  
  Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
  
  Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
  
  Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  
  Geng, F., & Yu, S. (2022). Exploring doctoral students’ emotions in feedback on academic writing: A critical incident perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 46(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2109616
  
  Hadden, A. A., & Frisby, B. N. (2019). Face threat mitigation in feedback: An examination of student feedback anxiety, self-efficacy, and perceived emotional support. Communication Quarterly, 67(1), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2018.1531043
  
  Hafour, M. F., & Alwaleedi, M. (2022). Students’ emotional and behavioral engagement: Cloud-based collaborative writing and learning analytics. Call-Ej, 23(1), 374-400.
  
  Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
  
  Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Learner engagement with written feedback: A sociocognitive perspective. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 247-264). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.015
  
  Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410
  
  Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond “doing time”: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.604951
  
  Harreveld, B., Danaher, M., Lawson, C., Knight, B. A., & Busch, G. (2016). Constructing methodology for qualitative research: Researching Education and Social Practices. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8
  
  Hill, J., Berlin, K., Choate, J., Cravens-Brown, L., McKendrick-Calder, L., & Smith, S. (2021). Exploring the emotional responses of undergraduate students to assessment feedback: Implications for instructors. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 9(1), 294-318. https://doi.org/10.20343/TEACHLEARNINQU.9.1.20
  
  Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6
  
  Inouye, K. S., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.14.2.3
  
  Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2022). Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(1), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2081209
  
  Karakose, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2023). Assessment of the relationships between prospective mathematics teachers’ classroom management anxiety, academic self-efficacy beliefs, academic motivation, and attitudes toward the teaching profession using structural equation modelling. Mathematics, 11(2), Article 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020449
  
  Kim, A. Y., & Kim, H. J. (2017). The effectiveness of instructor feedback for learning-oriented language assessment: Using an integrated reading-to-write task for English for academic purposes. Assessing Writing, 32, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.001
  
  Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An Analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415433
  
  Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50-80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
  
  Lei, Z., & Pramoolsook, I. (2020). Written supervisory feedback strategies on bachelor’s theses: Chinese EFL supervisors’ beliefs and practices. rEFLections, 27(2), 162-188. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i2.247274
  
  Li, Y., Hyland, F., & Hu, G. (2017). Prompting MEd students to engage with academia and the professional world through feedback. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.02.005
  
  Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
  
  Lunt, T., & Curran, J. (2010). “Are you listening please?” The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 759-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902977772
  
  Macfadyen, A., English, C., Kelleher, M., Coates, M., Cameron, C., & Gibson, V. (2019). ‘Am I doing it right?’ Conceptualizing the practice of supervising master’s dissertation students. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(5), 985-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1597024
  
  Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
  
  Man, D., Chau, M. H., & Kong, B. (2021). Promoting student engagement with teacher feedback through rebuttal writing. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 883-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1746238
  
  McClure, J. W. (2005). Preparing a laboratory-based thesis: Chinese international research students’ experiences of supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000291530
  
  Newman, R. (2016). Working talk: Developing a framework for the teaching of collaborative talk. Research Papers in Education, 31(1), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1106698
  
  Parker, M., & Winstone, N. E. (2016). Students’ perceptions of interventions for supporting their engagement with feedback. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64.
  
  Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
  
  Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
  
  Rowe, A. D. (2017). Feelings about feedback: The role of emotions in assessment for learning. In D. Carless, S. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education. The enabling power of assessment (Vol. 5; pp. 159-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_11
  
  Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
  
  Saeed, M. A., Al Qunayeer, H. S., & Al-Jaberi, M. A. (2021). Exploring supervisory feedback formulation on academic writing of research proposals and postgraduates’ responses to feedback: A case study. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007125
  
  Saeli, H., & Cheng, A. (2019). Student writers’ affective engagement with grammar-centred written corrective feedback: The impact of (mis)aligned practices and perceptions. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065058ar
  
  Shi, Y. (2021). Exploring learner engagement with multiple sources of feedback on L2 writing across genres. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 758867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758867
  
  Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
  
  Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532
  
  Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2016). Exploring doctoral students’ perceptions of language use in supervisory written feedback practices - Because “feedback is hard to have.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.2.02str
  
  Styles, I., & Radloff, A. (2001). The synergistic thesis: Student and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770020030533
  
  Sun, X., & Trent, J. (2020). Promoting agentive feedback engagement through dialogically minded approaches in doctoral writing supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(4), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1861965
  
  Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 242-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264
  
  van Tienoven, T. P., Glorieux, A., Minnen, J., te Braak, P., & Spruyt, B. (2022). Are graduate students locked down? PhD students’ satisfaction with supervision during the first and second COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium. PLoS ONE, 17(5), Article e0268923. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268923
  
  Värlander, S. (2008). The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510801923195
  
  Wang, L., & Lee, I. (2021). L2 learners’ agentic engagement in an assessment as a learning-focused writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 50, Article 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100571
  
  Xu, L. (2017). Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1237483
  
  Xu, L., & Hu, J. (2020). Language feedback responses, voices, and identity (re)construction: Experiences of Chinese international doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 724-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1593214
  
  Xu, L., Teng, L. S., & Cai, J. (2021). Feedback engagement of Chinese international doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 43(1), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1718634
  
  Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
  
  Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
  
  Young, K. A. (2005). Direct from the source: The value of “think-aloud” data in understanding learning. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6(1), 19-33.
  
  Yu, S., & Jiang, L. (2020). Studies in continuing education doctoral students ’ engagement with journal reviewers ’ feedback on academic writing. Studies in Continuing Education, 44(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1781610
  
  Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Yuan, K., & Zhang, L. (2018). Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879
  
  Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023). EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, Article 101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255
  
  Zhang, Z. (2017). Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: A case study. ELT Journal, 71(3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw089
  
  Zhang, Z. (2020). Learner engagement and language learning: A narrative inquiry of a successful language learner. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786712
  
  Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with the teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
  
  Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, Article 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586
  
  Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
  
  Zheng, Y., Yu, S., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2020). Understanding individual differences in lower proficiency students’ engagement with teacher written corrective feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1806225
  
  Zheng, Y., Yu, S., Wang, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis : Insights from a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1617181