PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

J

• Abdollahi, A., Panahipour, S., Tafti, M. A., & Allen, K. A. (2020). Academic hardiness as a mediator for the relationship between school belonging and academic stress. Psychology in the Schools, 57(5), 823-832. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22339

• Ahmad, C. N. C., Shaharim, S. A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2017). Teacher-student interactions, learning commitment, learning environment and their relationship with student learning comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 57-72.

• Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087315

• Attai, S. L., Reyes, J. C., Davis, J. L., York, J., Ranney, K., & Hyde, T. W. (2021). Investigating the impact of flexible furniture in the elementary classroom. Learning Environments Research, 24(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09322-1

• Baloğlu, Y. B. (2019). Re-defining the boundaries at schools: Perspectives from teachers’ interpretations of sources of spatial change. International Journal of Architectural Research, 14(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2019-0088

• Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013

• Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2016). The holistic impact of classroom spaces on learning in specific subjects. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516648735

• Bluteau, J., Aubenas, S., & Dufour, F. (2022). Influence of flexible classroom seating on the wellbeing and mental health of upper elementary school students: A gender analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 821227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821227

• Bøjer, B. (2019). Unlocking learning spaces: An examination of the interplay between the design of learning spaces a nd pedagogical practices. Rune Fjord Studio & The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts. https://adk.elsevierpure.com/ws/portalfiles/portal/63453689/Bodil_Bojer_PhDthesis_Unlocking_Learning_Spaces.pdf

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

• Brown, J., McLennan, C., Mercieca, D., Mercieca, D. P., Robertson, D. P., & Valentine, E. (2021). Technology as thirdspace: Teachers in Scottish schools engaging with and being challenged by digital technology in first COVID-19 lockdown. Education Sciences, 11(3), Article 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030136

• Campbell, M., Saltmarsh, S., Chapman, A., & Drew, C. (2013). Issues of teacher professional learning within ‘non-traditional’ classroom environments. Improving Schools, 16(3), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213501057

• Cardellino, P., & Woolner, P. (2019). Designing for transformation – a case study of open learning spaces and educational change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(3), 383-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1649297

• Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203591093

• Carvalho, L., Nicholson, T., Yeoman, P., & Thibaut, P. (2020). Space matters: Framing the New Zealand learning landscape. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 307-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09311-4

• Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3

• Dash, S. P., & Thilagam, N. L. (2022). A systematic review on inter-relationship of residential neighborhood characteristics on quality of life of elderly. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(4), 1533-1566. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.4.05

• Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610650201

• Deppeler, J., Corrigan, D., Macaulay, L., & Aikens, K. (2022). Innovation and risk in an innovative learning environment: A private public partnership in Australia. European Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 602-626. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211030400

• Dolan, P., Sturm, B., & Wollmuth, C. (2006). Prairie crossing charter school: Comfort as a principal component of high performance school design. Journal of Green Building, 1(3), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.1.3.17

• Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.882376

• Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071

• Ghadwan, A. S., Ahmad, W. M. W., & Hanifa, M. H. (2022). Financial planning for retirement models: An integrative systematic review. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(2), 879-900. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.2.24

• Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9071-x

• Grannäs, J., & Stavem, S. M. (2021). Transitions through remodelling teaching and learning environments. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1856564

• Gremmen, M. C., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Segers, E., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2016). Considerations for classroom seating arrangements and the role of teacher characteristics and beliefs. Social Psychology of Education, 19(4), 749-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9353-y

• Gultekin, M., & Ira, G. O. (2022). Pedagogy-driven design fundamentals of 21st century primary schools’ physical learning environments. Journal of Education and Future, (21), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.805905

• Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

• Harouni, H. (2013). Lived-in room: Classroom space as teacher. Berkeley Review of Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5070/b84110012

• Herman, F., & Tondeur, J. (2021). Untangling the sociomateriality of the classroom: Biographies of school spaces (c. 1960–2014). Oxford Review of Education, 47(5), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1924654

• Hoon, L. N., & Shaharuddin, S. S. (2019). Learning effectiveness of 3D hologram animation on primary school learners. Journal of Visual Art and Design, 11(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.vad.2019.11.2.2

• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818336

• Jagust, T., Boticki, I., & So, H. J. (2018). A review of research on bridging the gap between formal and informal learning with technology in primary school contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12252

• James, S. (2011). Independent report: Review of education capital (Report No. DFE-00073-2011). U.K. Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-education-capital

• Johler, M., Krumsvik, R. J., Bugge, H. E., & Helgevold, N. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of their role and classroom management practices in a technology rich primary school classroom. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 841385. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.841385

• Joint Information Systems Committee. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design. https://www.d41.org/cms/lib/IL01904672/Centricity/Domain/422/learningspaces.pdf

• Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. L., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A.-M. (2017). Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing. Learning Environments Research, 21(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9254-9

• Killeen, J. P., Evans, G. W., & Danko, S. (2003). The role of permanent student artwork in students sense of ownership in an elementary school. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502250133

• Lee, K. S., Kim, H. J., & Kang, J. (2019). From uniformity to sustainable diversity: Exploring the design attributes of renovating standardized classrooms in Korea. Sustainability, 11(20), Article 5669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205669

• Lee, S. (2019). Restructuring types of classroom space. Journal of Korea Intitute of Spatial Design, 14(5), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.35216/kisd.2019.14.5.53

• Li, P. P., Locke, J., Nair, P., & Bunting, A. (2005). Creating 21st century learning environments. In PEB Exchange, Programme on Educational Building (Vol. 10; pp. 15-26). OECD iLibrary. https://doi.org/10.1787/558676471016

• Liu, Q. Y., Ang, L. H., Waheed, M., & Kasim, Z. M. (2022). Appraisal theory in translation studies—a systematic literature review. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(4), 1589-1605. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.4.07

• López-Chao, V., Amado Lorenzo, A., Saorín, J. L., De La Torre-Cantero, J., & Melián-Díaz, D. (2020). Classroom indoor environment assessment through architectural analysis for the design of efficient schools. Sustainability, 12(5), Article 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052020

• Mackey, J., O’Reilly, N., Jansen, C., & Fletcher, J. (2018). Leading change to co-teaching in primary schools: A “down under” experience. Educational Review, 70(4), 465-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1345859

• Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

• Mokhtarmanesh, S., & Ghomeishi, M. (2019). Participatory design for a sustainable environment: Integrating school design using students’ preferences. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, Article 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101762

• Mulcahy, D., & Morrison, C. (2017). Re/assembling ‘innovative’ learning environments: Affective practice and its politics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1278354

• National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2021). Study quality assessment tools: Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools

• Niemi, K., Minkkinen, J., & Poikkeus, A.-M. (2022). Opening up learning environments: Liking school among students in reformed learning spaces. Educational Review, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2098927

• Nyabando, T., & Evanshen, P. (2022). Second grade students’ perspectives of their classrooms’ physical learning environment: A multiple case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(5), 709-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01183-4

• Oliveras-Ortiz, Y., Bouillion, D. E., & Asbury, L. (2021). Learning spaces matter: Student engagement in new learning environments. Journal of Education, 201(3), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420908062

• Osman, K., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Halim, L. (2011). Students’ perception of the physical and psychosocial science laboratory environment in Malaysia: Comparison across subject and school location. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1650-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.347

• Reh, S., Rabenstein, K., & Fritzsche, B. (2011). Learning spaces without boundaries? Territories, power and how schools regulate learning. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.542482

• Reinius, H., Korhonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). The design of learning spaces matters: Perceived impact of the deskless school on learning and teaching. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09345-8

• Rönnlund, M., Bergström, P., & Tieva, Å. (2021). Tradition and innovation. Representations of a “good” learning environment among Swedish stakeholders involved in planning, (re)construction and renovation of school buildings. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1774239

• Saltmarsh, S., Chapman, A., Campbell, M., & Drew, C. (2015). Putting “structure within the space”: Spatially un/responsive pedagogic practices in open-plan learning environments. Educational Review, 67(3), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.924482

• Sato, H., & Bradley, J. S. (2008). Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(4), 2064-2077. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2839283

• Shaffril, H. A. M., Ahmad, N., Samsuddin, S. F., Samah, A. A., & Hamdan, M. E. (2020). Systematic literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, Article 120595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120595

• Sigurdardottir, A. K., & Hjartarson, T. (2016). The idea and reality of an innovative school: From inventive design to established practice in a new school building. Improving Schools, 19(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480215612173

• Starkey, L., Leggett, V., Anslow, C., & Ackley, A. (2021). The use of furniture in a student-centred primary school learning environment. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00187-9

• Swartz, A. M., Tokarek, N. R., Strath, S. J., Lisdahl, K. M., & Cho, C. C. (2020). Attentiveness and fidgeting while using a stand-biased desk in elementary school children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), Article 3976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113976

• Szpytma, C., & Szpytma, M. (2022). School architecture for primary education in a post-socialist country: A case study of Poland. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(4), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1777843

• To, P. T., & Grierson, D. (2019). An application of measuring visual and non-visual sensorial experiences of nature for children within primary school spaces Child-nature-distance case studies in Glasgow, Scotland. Archnet-IJAR, 14(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-05-2019-0139

• Tokarek, N. R., Cho, C. C., Strath, S. J., & Swartz, A. M. (2022). The impact of stand-biased desks on afterschool physical activity behaviors of elementary school children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), Article 7689. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137689

• Uduku, O. (2015). Spaces for 21st-century learning. In Routledge Handbook of International Education and Development (pp. 196-209). Routledge.

• Vijapur, D., Candido, C., Göçer, Ö., & Wyver, S. (2021). A ten-year review of primary school flexible learning environments: Interior design and IEQ performance. Buildings, 11(5), Article 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11050183

• Wallace, A. L., Swartz, A. M., Cho, C. C., Kaiver, C. M., Sullivan, R. M., & Lisdahl, K. M. (2022). Stand-biased desks impact on cognition in elementary students using a within-classroom crossover design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), Article 5684. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095684

• Wang, X., & Wang, T. (2020). The mutability of pedagogical practice and space use: A case study of collaborative learning and classroom space in a Chinese primary school. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(5), 729-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1811640

• Whitehouse, D. (2009). Designing learning spaces that work: A case for the importance of history. History of Education Review, 38, 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/08198691200900016

• Woolner, P. (2014). School design together. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774107

• World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Schools_of_the_Future_Report_2019.pdf

• Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

• Yao, F., Bo, G., & Zitong, W. (2024). Association between visual distance and students’ visual perception comfort in primary and secondary classrooms. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 23(2), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2245019

• Yeoman, P. (2018). The material correspondence of learning. In R. A. Ellis & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Spaces of teaching and learning: Integrating perspectives on research and practice (pp. 81-103). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_6

• Zairul, M., Azli, M., & Azlan, A. (2023). Defying tradition or maintaining the status quo? Moving towards a new hybrid architecture studio education to support blended learning post-COVID-19. Archnet-IJAR, 17(3), 554-573. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-11-2022-0251

• Zhang, D., Ortiz, M. A., & Bluyssen, P. M. (2019). Clustering of Dutch school children based on their preferences and needs of the IEQ in classrooms. Building and Environment, 147, 258-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.014