PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

J

• Ahmad Faozi bin Mansor v. Norhafizah binti Ahmad (14002-058-0001-2004).

• Ahmad, M. H., Baharuddin, A. S., Zakaria, M. A., Nordin, N., Ishak, S. K., & Othman, N. K. (2020). Bukti saintifik dan penerimaannya di Mahkamah Syariah: Analisis perundangan bagi undang-undang keterangan Mahkamah Syariah [Scientific evidence and its admissibility in Syariah Court: Legal analysis of Syariah Court evidence law]. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 32(1), 67-92.

• Ajmawati Atan v. Moriazi Mohamad, 1 CLJ (SYA) 54 (2005).

• Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., & Mutalib, L. A. (2021, Jun 8). An overview on the falsification of document according to fiqh and legal perspectives [Conference session]. Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Management and Muamalah, Faculty of Management and Muamalah, Kolej Universiti Islam Selangor (KUIS), Malaysia. http://conference.kuis.edu.my/icomm/8th/e-proceeding/table-of-content#laws

• Baharuddin, A. S., Ahmad, M. H., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Mutalib, L. A., & Wan Harun, M. A. (2019). Catalysing global peace through the strengthening of forensic science application in Sharī’ah Law. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 77-103.

• Evidence Act [Act 56] s. 3, s. 90A (Malaysia) (1950).

• Hadi, K. A. A., & Paino, H. (2016). Legal perspectives towards forgery, fraud and falsification of documents: Recent development. Management & Accounting Review, 15(2), 93-109.

• Halijah binti Abdul Rahman v. Zambree bin Baharom (05001-054-0055-2008).

• Ibnu Qayyim. (2007). Al-turuq al-hukmiyyah fi al-siyasah al-syar’iyyah [Judicial methods in Islamic law]. Dar ‘Am al-Fawa’id.

• Ibnu Taimiyyah. (1995). Majmu’ al-fatawa’ [Group of fatwa]. Majmu al-Malik Fahad Litiba’ah al.

• Jamal, J. (2011). Kebolehterimaan teknologi dalam undang-undang keterangan Islam di Mahkamah Syariah [Admissibility of technology in Islamic evidence law in Syariah Courts]. Jurnal Hukum, 33(1), 1-12.

• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijned, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

• Md Noor, R. (2008). Kedudukan Bayyinah, Syahadah dan Qarinah dalam penggubalan undang-undang keterangan Islam di Malaysia [The position of Bayyinah, Syahadah and Qarinah in the enactment of Islamic evidence law in Malaysia]. Jurnal Syariah, 16(2), 1-23.

• Mohamed, D., & Ramlee, Z. (2014). Cases of electronic evidence in Malaysian courts: The civil and Syariah perspective. ICSSR e-Journal of Social Science Research, 1(2), 1-10.

• Mohamed, N., Nawawi, A., Ismail, I. S., Ahmad, S. A., Azmi, N. A., & Zakaria, N. B. (2014). Cyber fraud challenges snd the analysts competency: Evidence from digital forensic Department of Cyber Security Malaysia. Recent Trends in Social and Behaviour Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 581-583). CRC Press.

• Mohd Nizam bin Abdul Malik v. Fauziah binti Mohd Isa (14004-058-0030-2006).

• Muhamad, M. M., Mohd Shariff, A. A., Rajamanickam, R., Abdul Rahman, M., Zahid, A., & Ismail, N. (2015). Qarinah: Admissibility of circumstantial evidence in Hudud and Qisas cases. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p141

• Mutalib, L. A., & Wan Ismail, W. A. F. (2012). Al-Qarinah: Antara kekuatan dan keperluan dalam mensabitkan kesalahan jenayah (Zina) [Al-Qarinah: Among the strengths and needs in convicting criminal offenses (Adultery)]. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 2, 38-54.

• Penal Code [Act 574] s. 466, s. 468, s. 469 (Malaysia) (2006).

• PP v. Datuk Hj Sahar Arpan, 1 AMR (2007).

• Ramlee bin Ismail v. Masuah binti Abd Rashid (14005-058-0336-2007).

• Rohizan, N. Q. A, Alkawaz, M. H., Ghazali, S. A., & Bachok, R. (2017). Admissibility of documentary evidence for the law enforcement. Journal of Management & Science, 5(1), 10-17.

• Sa’di, M. M., Kamarudin, A. R., Mohamed, D., & Ramlee, Z. (2015). Authentication of electronic evidence in cybercrime cases based on Malaysian laws. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23(S), 153-168.

• Saad, Z. R. (2015). Pembuktian dalam kes jenayah Syariah Malaysia: Isu dan penyelesaian [Evidence in Malaysian Syariah criminal cases: Issues and solutions]. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 27(1), 122-142.

• Saifuddin, S., Markom, R., & Muhamad, M. M. (2019). Kaedah pembuktian dalam undang-undang keterangan Mahkamah Syariah dan Mahkamah Sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan [Methods of proof in the evidence law of Syariah Courts and Civil Courts in Malaysia: A comparative study]. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 31(1), 1-34.

• Shaffril, H. A. M. M., Samsuddin, S. F., & Samah, A. A. (2020). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55, 1319-1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

• Shariff, A. A. M. M., Azhar, A., Rajamanickam, R., Manap, N. A., Hussein, S. M., Said, M. H. M., Ab Halim, A. H., & Markom, R. (2019). Analysis on admissibility of DNA evidence in Malaysian Syariah Courts. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(4), 159.

• Syariah Court Evidence (Federal Territories) Act [Act 561] s. 3, s. 33, s. 49 (Malaysia) (1997).

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F. (2015). Forms of document falsification in Malaysia’s Syariah Courts. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(9), 32-39.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F. (2016). Penerimaan dan kekuatan dokumen elektronik dalam pembuktian di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia [Acceptance and strength of electronic documents as proof in Malaysian Syariah Courts]. Jurnal Kanun, 28(2), 338-355.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F. (2020). Keterangan dokumentar menurut fiqh dan undang-undang keterangan Islam di Malaysia [Documentary evidence according to Islamic jurisprudence and evidence law in Malaysia]. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., & Mehmet, A. (2017). The legal forensic model in determining the genuineness of Islamic banking documents and their application in Shariah Courts. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 7(2), 115-127.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., & Ramlee, Z. (2013). Keterangan melalui Kitābah: Menurut fiqh dan undang-undang semasa di Malaysia [Evidence through the Kitābah: According to current fiqh and law in Malaysia]. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 17, 1-11.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Abdul Shukor, S., Hashim, H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2019). Pembuktian melalui Televisyen/Kamera Litar Tertutup (CCTV) dalam kes-kes jenayah: Tinjauan umum berdasarkan undang-undang keterangan Islam [Evidence based on CCTV In criminal cases: An overview based on Islamic law of evidence]. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(1), 87-103.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Abdullah, Z. H., Abd Murad, A. H., Che Amani, N., Mutalib, L., Hanafi, L. H., & Khir, M. M. (2015). Bentuk-bentuk pemalsuan dokumen menurut fiqh dan perundangan Islam di Malaysia: Satu analisa [Forms of document forgery according to islamic fiqh and law in Malaysia: An analysis]. The e-Journal of Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah, 2(1), 1-11.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L. A., & Alias, M. A. A. (2021). An appraisal of digital documents as evidence in Islamic Law. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 198. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0076

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L. A., & Saharudin, N. S. (2019). Understanding of Syariah practitioners in Malaysia on document forgery. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 349-355.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L., & Alias, M. A. A. (2020, October 27). The admissibility of digital document according to Syariah law: A preliminary analysis [Conference session]. International on Syariah and Law, Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Malaysia. https://insla.usim.edu.my/index.php/eproceeding/article/view/53

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Mutalib, L. A., Abdullah, Z. H., Abd Murad, A. H., Che Amani, N., & Khir, M. M. (2015). Document forensic, the fiqh and the Syariah Courts. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(4), 132-139.

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Shukor, S. A., Hashim, H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2018). Pembuktian melalui Televisyen/Kamera Litar Tertutup (CCTV) dalam kes-kes jenayah: Tinjauan umum berdasarkan undang-undang keterangan Islam [Evidence through Television/Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras in criminal cases: An overview based on Islamic evidence law]. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 474(6194), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.12816/0051393

• Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Shukor, S. A., Hashim, H., Mutalib, L. A., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2019). The reality on application and challenges of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) images as evidence in Shariah criminal cases in Malaysia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 356-361. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7661

• Yusof, S. M., Rajamanickam, R., & Ab. Halim, A. H. (2019). Kebolehterimaan keterangan forensik dari perspektif Maqāsid Syariah [Admissibility of forensic evidence from the perspective of Maqāsid Syariah]. Journal of Southeast Asia Social Sciences and Humanities, 89(2), 117-127.

• Zabariah binti Mat Piah v. Abas Syed Ibrahim (06100-041-0422-2008).