PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

Previous studies have sufficiently debated science teachers’ pedagogical orientations (PO); however, research on students’ preferred or desired orientations is scarce. This study determined students’ preferred teaching orientations in relationship with their teachers’ PO. The sample included 313 grade VIII students and 94 teachers from middle schools in Peshawar-Pakistan. Three vignettes from the Pedagogy of Science Teaching Tests (POSTT) were used to find PO. Data was analyzed using frequency count, means, and t-test. The findings revealed students’ and teachers’ preferences for didactic direct and active direct orientations. However, the choice of orientation varied with the nature of the topic. The students and teachers showed the least preference for open inquiry orientation. A significant positive correlation existed between teachers’ PO and teaching experience, and a negative correlation existed between students’ preferred orientations and academic achievement in the general science subject. Interestingly, students with higher test scores preferred teacher-centered instead of student-centered orientations. The study suggests improving teacher education programs to train science teachers in inquiry orientations and its proper integration with science content at all levels.

• Anderson, C., & Smith, E. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). Longman.

• Bansiong, A. J. (2023). Direct or inquiry? Science teaching orientations of prospective secondary science teachers. Mountain Journal of Science and Interdisciplinary Research, 83(1), 34-49.

• Boesdorfer, S., & Lorsbach, A. (2014). PCK in action: Examining one chemistry teacher’s practice through the lens of her orientation toward science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2111–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.909959

• Cansiz, N., & Cansiz, M. (2016). Preservice science teachers’ orientations towards teaching science to middle schoolers. Online Submission, 7(3), 69–78.

• Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Skjold, B. A., Muğaloğlu, E. Z., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of science teaching tests: Formative assessments of science teaching orientations. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2265–2288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.918672

• Dahar, M. A., & Faize, F. A. (2011a). Effect of the availability and the use of instructional material on academic performance of students in Punjab (Pakistan). Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 11, 6–18.

• Dahar, M. A., & Faize, F. A. (2011b). Effect of the availability and the use of science laboratories on academic achievement of students in Punjab (Pakistan). European Journal of Scientific Research, 51(2), 193–202.

• Dahar, M. A., Dahar, R. A., Iqbal, M. Z., & Faize, F. A. (2010). Impact of the per pupil expenditures on academic achievement of students at the secondary stage in Punjab (Pakistan). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 52(52), 122–133.

• Dahar, M. A., Dahar, R.T., Dahar, R. A., & Faize, F. A. (2011). Impact of the prior school environment on academic achievement of students at the secondary stage in Punjab (Pakistan). European Journal of Social Sciences, 19(1), 106-113.

• Faize, F. A., & Akhtar, M. (2020). Addressing environmental knowledge and attitude in undergraduate students through scientific argumentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119928

• Faize, F. A. (2011). Problem and prospect of science education at secondary level in Pakistan [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. International Islamic University.

• Faize, F. A. (2015). Introducing argumentation at higher education in Pakistan-A new paradigm of teaching ethic-based topics. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 8-13.

• Faize, F. A. (2022). Assessing science teachers’ understanding about the nature of scientific inquiry and its reflection in students’ responses using the VASI questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 44(14), 2224-2240 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2116959

• Faize, F. A., Akhtar, M., & Hamayun, M. (2024). Developing persuasive writing skills through scientific argumentation using a time-series design. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 42(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.543991

• Faize, F. A., Idress, S., & Sohail, M. (2023). Assessing mental health literacy in Pakistani youth using case-vignettes. Mental Health Review Journal, 28(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-05-2022-0028

• Feyzioğlu, E. Y. (2015). Pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical orientations of science inquiry continuum. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(11), 1–36.

• Feyzioğlu, E. Y., Feyzioğlu, B., & Demirci, N. (2016). Aktif doğrudan veya yapilandirilmiş buluş: fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin fen öğretimi yönelimlerinin belirlenmesi [Active direct or structured discovery: Determining science teachers’ science teaching orientations]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(39), 150–173. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.49128

• Friedrichsen, P., & Dana, T. M. (2005). A substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20046

• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2003). Using a card-sorting task to elicit and clarify science-teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000009551.37237.b3

• Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive‐level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20046

• Güven, D., Mugaloglu, E. Z., Dogança-Küçük, Z., & Cobern, W. W. (2019). Teaching orientations of freshman pre-service science teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.4

• Khwaja, T., Zafar, A. M., & Faize, F. A. (2022). Accidental leaders: Experiences and perspectives of higher education leaders in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 10(2), 168–194. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.8440

• Listiani, L., Cobern, W. W., & Pleasants, B. A. (2019). An Indonesian translation and adaptation of the POSTT: A science teacher pedagogical orientation, formative assessment device. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(3), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.231

• Listiani, L., & Adhani, A. (2023). Profiling the preservice biology teachers’ teaching orientations: Challenges of 21st century learning. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 77-88.

• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187009

• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4

• Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U. (2018). Relationship between teaching context and teachers’ orientations to science teaching. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), Article em1564. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91910

• Nargund‐Joshi, V., Rogers, M. A. P., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Exploring Indian secondary teachers’ orientations and practice for teaching science in an era of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20429

• Ramnarain, U., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African physical sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9395-5

• Renee’S, S., Schuster, D., Cobern, W., Applegate, B., Titrek, O., & Iskender, M. (2010). Assessing teachers’ orientations toward inquiry science teaching: Instrument development and international collaboration. In G. Cakmakci & M. F. Taşar (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: Learning and assessment (pp. 235–246). ESERA.

• Revathi, S., & John, S. (2019). Learning preferences transformation in tertiary education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2S), 215-220.

• Sahingoz, S. (2017). An investigation of Turkish middle school science teachers’ pedagogical orientations towards direct and inquiry instructional approaches [Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/36262c9303af4f79dfd2cdcfe6c5ff2b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

• Sahingoz, S., & Cobern, W. W. (2020). Science methods course influence on pedagogical orientations of pre-service science teachers. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.236.7

• Thornburgh, W., & Brown, S. (2023). Measuring pre-service elementary teachers’ changes in pedagogical orientation towards science teaching. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching & Learning, 19, 104-118.

• Zafar, A., Zafar, M. A., Faize, F. A., & Ahmad, R. H. (2022). Understanding teacher identity and perceptions of action research as a professional development tool in Pakistan. Journal of Education, 204(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574221106753

• Zaman, A., Niwaz, A., Faize, F. A., Dahar, M. A., & Alamgir. (2010). Analysis of multiple-choice items and the effect of items’ sequencing on difficulty level in the test of mathematics. European Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 61–67.