PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

Teknologi hologram kini semakin banyak digunakan dalam pelbagai bidang termasuk bidang pendidikan. Penggunaan hologram dilihat sangat berpotensi untuk dijadikan sebagai perwakilan tenaga pengajar sebenar di dalam kelas. Penggunaan tutor hologram juga dikatakan mampu menarik minat serta meningkatkan motivasi pelajar terhadap proses pembelajaran. Dengan pelbagai kelebihan yang ditawarkan, aspek pengalaman pelajar (LX) terhadap penggunaan tutor hologram ini tetap menjadi persoalan. Terutamanya, dari sudut pengalaman dan penerimaan pelajar dari pelbagai peringkat umur. Hal ini kerana, pengalaman dan penerimaan seseorang terhadap sesuatu teknologi baharu dilihat berbeza berdasarkan umur mereka. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan tutor hologram karakter manusia sebenar serta melihat kesannya terhadap pengalaman pelajar (LX) yang terdiri dari pelbagai peringkat umur. Secara khusus, responden bagi kajian ini terdiri daripada empat kumpulan yang berbeza peringkat umur yang dipilih dari sekolah rendah hingga ke peringkat tertiari. Soal selidik User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) telah digunakan untuk mendapatkan maklum balas pelajar sebaik selesai sesi pembelajaran dengan tutor hologram. Secara kesimpulan, terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan bagi pengalaman pelajar (LX) pelbagai kategori umur terhadap tutor hologram karakter manusia sebenar. Namun, skor min pengalaman pelajar (LX) tetap berada pada tahap yang positif dan neutral bagi setiap kumpulan.

• Ali, A. Z. M. (2018). Multimedia dan perisian pendidikan: Panduan praktikal reka bentuk dan penyelidikan [Multimedia and educational software: A practical guide to design and research]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

• Awad, A. H., & Kharbat, F. F. (2018). The first design of a smart hologram for teaching. Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2018.8376931

• Barkhaya, N. M., & Abd Halim, N. D. (2016, December 7-8). A review of application of 3D Hologram in Education: A meta-analysis. 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceed.2016.7856083

• BBC News. (2000, January 13). Meet the hologram teacher. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/education/2000/bett2000/600667.stm

• Chan, C. K. (2013). Use of animation in engaging teachers and students in assessment in Hong Kong higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 474-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.847795

• Chaudhari, A., Lakhani, K., & Deulkar, K. (2015). Transforming the world using holograms. International Journal of Computer Applications, 130(1), 30-32. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015906867

• Chiang, Y., & Tu, J. (2016). The influence of design strategy of peer learning on 3-D software learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1263-1271. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1511a

• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.

• Elmorshidy, A. (2010). Holographic projection technology: The world is changing. Journal of Telecommunications, 2(2), 104-112.

• Fausset, C. B., Harley, L., Farmer, S., & Fain, B. (2013). Older adults’ perceptions and use of technology: A novel approach. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39191-0_6

• Figueiredo, M. J., Cardoso, P. J., Gonçalves, C. D., & Rodrigues, J. M. (2014). Augmented reality and holograms for the visualization of mechanical engineering parts. In 2014 18th International Conference on Information Visualisation (pp. 368-373). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2014.17

• Ghuloum, H. (2010). 3D hologram technology in learning environment. Proceedings of the 2010 InSITE Conference, 693-704. https://doi.org/10.28945/1283

• Githens, R. (2007). Older adults and e-learning: Opportunities and barriers. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 329-338.

• Hauk, N., Hüffmeier, J., & Krumm, S. (2018). Ready to be a silver surfer? A meta-analysis on the relationship between chronological age and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 304-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.020

• Heart, T., & Kalderon, E. (2013). Older adults: Are they ready to ADOPT health-related ICT? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(11), e209-e223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.002

• Heinz, M., Martin, P., Margrett, J. A., Yearns, M., Franke, W., Yang, H.-I., Wong, J., & Chang, C. K. (2012). Perceptions of technology among older adults. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 39(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20121204-04

• Hong, K., Yeom, J., Jang, C., Li, G., Hong, J., & Lee, B. (2014). Two-dimensional and three-dimensional transparent screens based on lens-array holographic optical elements. Optics Express, 22(12), 14363-14374. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.22.014363

• Kainz, O., Jakab, F., & Kardoš, S. (2013). The computer animation in education. In 2013 IEEE 11th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) (pp. 201-206). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2013.6674428

• Kelion, L. (2018, November 1). ‘Hologram’ lecturers to teach students at Imperial College London. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46060381

• Kim, B., Jung, M., & Kim, J. (2018). Development and application of 3D-Hologram maker education materials for high school students in Korea. Advanced Science Letters, 24(3), 2114-2117. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11867

• Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

• Liu, C., & Elms, P. (2019). Animating student engagement: The impacts of cartoon instructional videos on learning experience. Research in Learning Technology, 27, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2124

• Luévano, L., Lara, E. L., & Quintero, H. (2019). Professor avatar holographic telepresence model. In M. Kumar (Ed.), Holographic materials and applications (pp. 91-107). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85528

• Mannheim, I., Schwartz, E., Xi, W., Buttigieg, S. C., McDonnell-Naughton, M., Wouters, E. J., & Van Zaalen, Y. (2019). Inclusion of older adults in the research and design of digital technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193718

• Marsh, C. (2016). We attended the Hatsune Miku Expo to find out if a hologram pop star could be human. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/ae87yb/hatsune-miku-expo-feature

• Martha, A. S., & Santoso, H. (2019). The design and impact of the pedagogical agent: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Educators Online, 16(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2019.16.1.8

• McLean, H. (2015). 3D holographic platform hits kickstarter. Smart Chimps. http://smartchimps.com/developers/3d-holographic-platform-hits-kickstarter/

• Ramlie, M. K., Mohamad Ali, A. Z., & Rokeman, M. I. (2020). Design approach of hologram tutor: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1336

• Mori, M., Macdorman, K., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98-100. https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2012.2192811

• Barkhaya, N. M., & Abd Halim, N. D. (2016). A review of application of 3D hologram in education: A meta-analysis. In 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 257-260). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856083

• O’connell, I., & Rock, J. (2012). U.S. Patent No. 8,328,361. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

• Park, J., Lee, K., & Park, Y. (2019). Ultrathin wide-angle large-area digital 3D holographic display using a non-periodic photon sieve. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09126-9

• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants - Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

• Pyeongho, C., Yoonhee, C., Misoo, P., & Seunghyun, L. (2019). Non-glasses stereoscopic 3D floating hologram system using polarization technique. International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 8(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2019.8.1.18

• Sanner-Stiehr, E. (2017). Can’t we all just get along? A dual-theory approach to understanding and managing the multigenerational workplace. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 103-110.

• Santoso, H., Schrepp, M., Isal, R., Utomo, A., & Priyogi, B. (2016). Measuring user experience of the student-centered e-Learning environment. Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 58-79.

• Sari, H., Othman, M., & Al-Ghaili, A. M. (2018). A proposed conceptual framework for mobile health technology adoption among employees at workplaces in Malaysia. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 736-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99007-1_68

• Taylor, M., Duffy, S., & Hughes, G. (2007). The use of animation in higher education teaching to support students with dyslexia. Education + Training, 49(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710729857

• Walker, R. A. (2013). Holograms as teaching agents. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 415(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/415/1/012076

• Wójcik, M. (2018). Holograms in libraries – The potential for education, promotion and services. Library Hi Tech, 36(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-11-2016-0142

• Yang, L., Dong, H., Alelaiwi, A., & Saddik, A. E. (2015). See in 3D: State of the art of 3D display technologies. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(24), 17121-17155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2981-y

• Zeng, Z., Zheng, H., Yu, Y., Asundi, A. K., & Valyukh, S. (2017). Full-color holographic display with increased-viewing-angle [Invited]. Applied Optics, 56(13), F112-F120. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.56.00f112

• Zhang, J., Pégard, N., Zhong, J., & Waller, L. (2017). 3D computer generated holography by nonconvex optimization. OSA Technical Digest, MTu2C.5. https://doi.org/10.1364/math.2017.mtu2c.5